Trumps Been Instigating Civil War The Whole Time
Trump radicalized US police, military and border patrol to attack peaceful protesters and the media.
This piece was recorded July 26, 2020. It is unfortunately still relevant. Trump went from fomenting civil disobedience in his initial campaign and first three years, to instigating civil war this year. By sending federal troops into cities and abusing national guard troops as well as border patrol in federal police actions, Trump has officially begun attacking and harassing and arresting American Citizens, often circumventing police procedure and miranda rights.
This move is NOT like Hitler in the 40’s. But it is like Hitler in the early 30’s. In fact it is practically a mirror image of how Hitler took power and rose to Chancellor in 1933 and Führer in 1934. The technique Trump uses is the same, an acceleration of intimidation and usage of power.
Note: The police officer pictured here is not only aiming at the media crew, he is actively shooting them with pepper bullets. There have now been hundreds of incident reports across America of media being targeted and harassed by police. This is Hitler’s America. This is Trump’s America.
Keep in mind that Ivana Trump, Donald’s first wife said that he only read one book. He kept it on his bedside table are read it diligently. That book she said, was a copy of Hitlers speeches. Donald quite apparently was studying up on how to rise to power and become Führer.
This is likely why he has spent so much time and energy attacking our first amendment rights. Saying the media is the enemy of the people, and even saying/inferring that anyone that speaks out against him, is treasonous.
Hitler used the Brown Shirts to intimidate and wreak havoc to keep people in line across Germany. Trump this year started using our own military and police to attack, arrest and intimidate the American people.
Trump is trying to take over America, all available evidence shows Donald Trump has clearly lost this election. And now he is asking ‘his’ people to fight back.
The messages in Trumps emails this past few days are:
- “Our Republic is under attack”
- “President Trump needs you to step up and defend Georgia.”
- “We’re doing everything we can to FIGHT BACK, but we can’t do it without you.”
- Don Jr. “America needs to WAKE UP”
- Eric Trump: “My father is counting on you to FIGHT BACK”
Federal Judges across the nation have said Trump has not shown any real evidence of voter fraud. Trump is trying to steal the election while saying the Democrats are trying to steal the election. Typical Trump as he accuses others of what he is doing.
Document Actions
A Lesson in Logic & Sophistry:
A poster using a false name posted in this thread. The original post has been deleted and replaced with a sentence by sentence examination of the original post.
Since the Centrist Party is about truth, evidence and logic in context, this post is an example of how things are misunderstood rather easily without proper and relevant context considered.
Here is the post broken down sentence by sentence:
1st sentence [opinion]: "I feel that this article is not written in the spirit of centrist party."
Spirit is undefined in the authors post. If one apply the tenets of the Centrist Party (CP), this post 'is' in the 'spirit' of the CP.
http://uscentrist.org/platform/guidelines/tenets
2nd sentence [sophist red herring]: "This article while containing factual information is written in the manner that a typical major media outlet would provide."
In news reporting, that's not a bad thing actually.
3rd sentence [False Logic: argumetum ad lapidem]: "This is a very one sided outlook on trumps tenure as president."
Reporting News is about reporting facts, not sides. Reporting both sides when one is factual and the other is propaganda is not News, but rather a mechanism that enhances 'confusion' of facts and propaganda.
4th sentence [Non sequitur/false logic argumentum ad poassiones]: "To try and convince your reader Trump is literally using Hitler as his basis for rule is nothing short of fear mongering."
Again, News is about 'informing' in a truthful manner. Plus I could write an entire book comparing Donald Trump and his kids in comparison to Hitler and Hitler's regime, and demonstrate a tremendous number of parallels. Whether a reader is 'convinced' about anything is dependent on the cognition and bias potentials of the reader.
5th sentence [Opinion, False claim and inference]: "Im not a Trump supporter but I find this in bad taste as the article does nothing to provide knowledge to the reader, but rather to strengthen a position against the Trump presidency."
The piece absolutely provides 'knowledge' to the reader. The parallels and connections form Trumps ONLY book he read according to his first wife Ivana and Trumps policies and actions of his administration. Whether the information causes a reader to be against or for Trump depends on whether the reader supports Republican Democracy (America) or Authoritarian Dictatorship (Donald Trump).
6th sentence [Opinion, false logic and sophist distraction(red herring)]: "how this is "news" is beyond me, this is an opinion piece at best."
The post author expresses his opinion that the piece is an "opinion piece", while also saying the piece contains "factual information". The definition of News is 'newly received or noteworthy information, especially about recent or important events'. So yes, this piece is a news piece.
Last sentence [Non sequitur]: Also, site some judges."
Citing "judges" is not needed for the piece to stand.
The CP is about upholding evidence, reason and logic in relevant context. Illogical posts are not allowed because they can easily distract and mislead readers.